Resources
Guides and resources for plaintiff and defence counsel retaining a specialist in hormone, peptide and AI medicine litigation.
Attorney Guide
6 min read
Records to gather, how the applicable standard is established, what makes a standard of care opinion Daubert-defensible, and why subspecialty match matters more than referral speed.
Read the full guide →Attorney Guide
6 min read
A five-step vetting process covering ABIM certification verification, publication review, litigation experience, subspecialty matching, and sourcing channel tradeoffs.
Read the full guide →Expert Witness Guide
5 min read
Subspecialty qualifications, case types covered, and why direct retention outperforms directories and broker networks for anabolic steroid and peptide matters.
Read the full guide →Expert Witness Guide
6 min read
What qualifies a hormone therapy expert witness, how TRT, HRT and GLP-1 litigation has evolved, and why subspecialty-matched direct retention outperforms directories and brokers.
Read the full guide →Expert Witness Guide
6 min read
Directory, broker, or direct-retained specialist — a side-by-side comparison of the three models and what each one means for who writes the opinion and how well it holds up.
Read the full guide →Expert Witness Guide
7 min read
Qualifications that hold up at trial, how specialist practices compare to generalist directories and referral brokers, and which case types demand genuine subspecialty depth.
Read the full guide →Expert Witness Guide
8 min read
What the work actually involves, what credentials survive cross-examination, and how to decide whether your BPC-157, TB-500 or compounded peptide case needs a subspecialist.
Read the full guide →Expert Witness Guide
12 min read
What credentials actually matter, why generalist directories fall short for peptide and hormone cases, and how to vet a candidate before retention — including a Daubert checklist for attorneys.
Read the full guide →